Tripod Advisors Tripod Advisors
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Schlesinger’s Thoughts
  • 关于
2014 Mar.26

Whither China Journalism…..

David SchlesingerBusiness, China, Media

chinafile1-300x75

I’m part of a rollicking discussion on ChinaFile on China journalism in the wake of the controversy over the remarks by Bloomberg’s chairman suggesting a pulling of punches and the subsequent resignation of a senior editor. The whole debate is here, and my part of it is reprinted below:

Whither China journalism…

 

The Chairman “rethinks,” a journalist departs with a bang, and Bloomberg, which had led the way in authoritative investigative reports on the government/business nexus in China becomes instead the poster child for the ills of the business/pressure nexus in journalism.

Does this mean that it is impossible to do good journalism in China? Of course not.

In some ways, this is a golden age for foreign reporting in the People’s Republic. Key wire services, newspapers and magazines have more and better trained reporters in China than ever before, travel is freer, sources are more available and the amount of sheer official data, information and verbiage that is turned out is unrivaled—and almost impossible to keep up with. The trick is turning all this raw input into journalism of the highest order.

Bloomberg and The New York Times showed that weaving publicly available information with source material can yield treasures, but also bring China’s wrath and financial penalties. That’s a big risk to take, but it is one worth taking and also possible to take, if you have courage and prepare the ground properly.

First, you have to be clear about what you are and what you stand for, and not let any opportunity go by without repeating it. Just as China repeats its “principled stands” on Taiwan, Tibet, human rights, etc., in word-perfect order year after year, so too I, when I worked for Reuters, would use that company’s Trust Principles and fundamental journalistic values as the introduction to any official meeting. If your principles are strong and steadfast, they become something that has to be dealt with. If your principles can be rethought and changed, they become simply a negotiating point.

Second, you must make sure you have plenty of opportunities to talk about your principles! Government relations is not something that is just for crisis times, it must be a key job for bureau chiefs, editors and senior company officials year in and year out. Your reporting focuses should never be a surprise. Your standards should be the stuff of regular conversations.

Third, you have to be good. We know Bloomberg’s first stories were good—we read them. The story that has caused the current uproar has not been published so quite honestly none of us can really judge. We have excellent reporters and editors saying it was ready to go, we have the editor-in-chief, himself an excellent journalist, saying it wasn’t. Is this the reporter vs. editor tension that every organization has—and which is actually what you need for quality—or is it something nefarious? We really can’t and shouldn’t say. What we can say is that if you want to do tough reporting on China, your stories had better be bullet proof, because the bullets will come.

Fourth, you have to be ready for all your preparatory work to be for naught and for China to sanction you. China has expelled reporters in the past, it can and has caused monumental and even insurmountable bureaucratic headaches for others, it has caused economic harm by restricting sales and blocking websites. But China, with its 5,000 years of history, is excellent at playing the long game, and if you want to be in China that is the game you must play. Ignore quarterly results. Ignore annual profit. Concentrate on the long term effects on your reputation and standing, and on the eventual need for China to be more open.

Fifth, you need to get your stakeholders involved. You should be writing the tough stories because your readers need them. The banks and brokerages who subscribe to Bloomberg should be demanding more of the investigative reports because they help them make decisions. The exchanges who list Chinese IPOs should be demanding more of the reports because they bring needed transparency to the market. And if your readers aren’t demanding the stories, you’re either writing them wrong or you’re not working with your readers closely enough.

Sixth, you must be fair and acknowledge that China’s reflexive paranoia that foreign reporting on China is out to “get” the People’s Republic can sometimes be stimulated by the stories themselves. If you go after the intricate relationship between business and government in China without going after the intricate relationship between business and government in the United States with the same fervor, you are doing no one any favors. If you write China stories loaded with snark and without empathy for China’s point of view, you merely play into perpetuating an unhealthy antagonism instead of the healthy skepticism and drive for the truth that good journalism must be.

BLOOMBERGCHINACHINAFILEFOREIGN REPORTINGJOURNALISMMEDIAPRESS FREEDOM
Share this:
  • Previous

    Confucius Institutes: Shun Them or Engage

  • Next

    Elected to the Global Editors Network board

Latest in Schlesinger’s Thoughts

  • Can the G7 Compete with Belt and Road?
  • Chinese Jets, Taiwanese Angst, American Statements
  • China’s Covid Lockdowns – Testing Times
  • Xi, Putin and Ukraine
  • China 2021 GDP Growth – Phew!

Categories

  • Asia
  • Business
  • China
  • Media
  • Portfolio
  • Speeches
  • Uncategorized

Tags

AGENCY BUSINESS BUSINESS CHINA CHINA CHINAFILE CHINAFILE CPJ DAVID SCHLESINGER DAVID SCHLESINGER diplomacy Economy EXPERIENCE FOREIGN REPORTING FOREIGN REPORTING FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION HONG KONG HONG KONG HUMAN RIGHTS INFORMATION INFORMATION JOURNALISM JOURNALISM LEADERSHIP MEDIA MEDIA Military North Korea PRESS FREEDOM PRESS FREEDOM Protests REUTERS Russia SOCIAL MEDIA SOFT POWER SPEECHES Taiwan Trade TRIPOD ADVISORS Trump U.S. United States Xi Jinping XINJIANG

Archives

  • June 2022  2
  • April 2022  1
  • March 2022  1
  • January 2022  1
  • December 2021  1
  • November 2021  1
  • October 2021  1
  • September 2021  2
  • July 2021  1
  • June 2021  2
  • May 2021  1
  • July 2020  2
  • April 2020  1
  • March 2020  2
  • January 2020  1
  • December 2019  2
  • October 2019  2
  • September 2019  1
  • August 2019  2
  • July 2019  1
  • June 2019  2
  • March 2019  4
  • February 2019  1
  • January 2019  2
  • December 2018  1
  • November 2018  2
  • September 2018  1
  • August 2018  5
  • July 2018  2
  • June 2018  2
  • May 2018  3
  • April 2018  2
  • August 2017  3
  • June 2017  1
  • May 2017  1
  • March 2017  1
  • February 2017  1
  • November 2016  2
  • September 2016  2
  • July 2016  1
  • June 2016  1
  • March 2016  1
  • February 2016  2
  • December 2015  2
  • November 2015  1
  • October 2015  1
  • September 2015  1
  • August 2015  3
  • July 2015  3
  • April 2015  1
  • February 2015  1
  • January 2015  3
  • October 2014  2
  • September 2014  1
  • July 2014  2
  • June 2014  1
  • March 2014  2
  • February 2014  1
  • January 2014  1
  • October 2013  3
  • September 2013  1
  • July 2013  2
  • May 2013  3
  • March 2013  5
  • February 2013  1
  • January 2013  1
  • November 2012  2
  • October 2012  1
  • September 2012  3
  • August 2012  1
  • July 2012  1
© 2016 Tripod Advisors. D. A. Schlesinger Limited. Designed by iPulse Design Ltd.