Tripod Advisors Tripod Advisors
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Schlesinger’s Thoughts
  • 关于
2014 Sep.03

The Tragedy of Hong Kong Politics

David SchlesingerChina

occupycentral

 

I’ve contributed chinafilemy thoughts to a new ChinaFile debate on Hong Kong. The full debate is here.

 

 

My contribution:

Hong Kong’s tragedy is that its political consciousness began to awaken precisely at the time when its leverage with China was at its lowest ebb.

Where once China needed Hong Kong as an entrepôt, legal center, financial center, talent center, and education center, now the situation is reversed. Hong Kong is dependent on China—without Chinese deals Hong Kong’s law firms, investment banks and private equity players would swiftly relocate elsewhere; without Chinese tourists Hong Kong’s hotels and shopping emporia would shudder and shutter; without Chinese-linked opportunities Hong Kong’s young people would face under- or unemployment.

Hong Kong went through 150 years of relatively benign colonial rule by Britain without London ever creating true democratic consciousness or institutions and without Hong Kong ever truly demanding more of a say in its administration. Hong Kong’s business elites vied for British favor and awards, from business monopolies to the sovereign’s bestowed knighthoods.

China surely counted on the change of suzerain leading to a simple change of focus from London to Beijing—and, frankly, in the case of many in the business and political elite that’s exactly what happened.

But for the many thousands of young people especially who expected more democracy, who are demanding more of a say in their future, who are developing a sense of Hong Kongness as distinct from Chineseness, there is nothing but disappointment in the air.

With Hong Kong being but a 7.5 million–strong irritation or embarrassment in a wider polity of 1.3 billion people, however, no one could reasonably expect the tail to shake the dragon.

Hong Kong should focus on what is vital for securing that which has always made it unique and special.

First: define the terms. The requirement that judges and the Hong Kong Chief Executive should love China and love Hong Kong must be defined as simple, transparent patriotism and nothing more. In other words, it must not be confused with loving the Communist Party, or having to favor the Party or Party controlled companies in any court case or government decision. It should be only as natural as the President of the United States, for example, reciting and believing in the “Pledge of Allegiance”, making no further claims upon conscience or belief.

Second: protect freedom of speech. University governing councils must respect and defend the right of students and faculty to explore all areas of inquiry. Media must refrain from self-censorship and must be called to account when they waver and rewarded when they stand true to principle. Businesses must not use economic sanctions to punish media’s journalistic activities or commentary and must, instead, recognize that free expression and inquiry ultimately improve the business environment through transparency.

Third: preserve the independent judiciary. Police, prosecutors and judges must never allow themselves to be politicized and must stand absolutely firm as bastions of the community’s principled conscience.

Finally, Hong Kong people should come to terms with their distinctness within a dependence on China, with the equality of interchange and discussion that implies. Ultimately, Hong Kong’s having a future that is more palatable and positive for the young people of today depends more on China evolving than on any other factor.

((Photo by Lam Yik Fei, Getty Images via ChinaFile))

CHINACHINAFILEELECTIONHONG KONG
Share this:
  • Previous

    Think Horizontal, Not Vertical

  • Next

    The Scars of Tiananmen…and Hong Kong

Latest in Schlesinger’s Thoughts

  • Hong Kong, Security Law, Sanctions, Compliance and IPOs
  • Webinar on Hong Kong
  • Soft Power – Stirring Symbols in Times of Virus
  • Webinar on Leading During The Crisis
  • New Ways Of Managing in the Age of the Virus

Categories

  • Asia
  • Business
  • China
  • Media
  • Portfolio
  • Speeches
  • Uncategorized

Tags

AGENCY BUSINESS BUSINESS CHINA CHINA CHINAFILE CHINAFILE coronavirus CPJ DAVID SCHLESINGER DAVID SCHLESINGER diplomacy Economy EXPERIENCE FOREIGN REPORTING FOREIGN REPORTING FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION HONG KONG HONG KONG HUMAN RIGHTS INFORMATION INFORMATION JOURNALISM JOURNALISM LEADERSHIP MEDIA MEDIA Military North Korea PRESS FREEDOM PRESS FREEDOM Protests REUTERS SOCIAL MEDIA SOFT POWER SPEECHES Taiwan Trade TRIPOD ADVISORS Trump U.S. United States Xi Jinping XINJIANG

Archives

  • July 2020  2
  • April 2020  1
  • March 2020  2
  • January 2020  1
  • December 2019  2
  • October 2019  2
  • September 2019  1
  • August 2019  2
  • July 2019  1
  • June 2019  2
  • March 2019  4
  • February 2019  1
  • January 2019  2
  • December 2018  1
  • November 2018  2
  • September 2018  1
  • August 2018  5
  • July 2018  2
  • June 2018  2
  • May 2018  3
  • April 2018  2
  • August 2017  3
  • June 2017  1
  • May 2017  1
  • March 2017  1
  • February 2017  1
  • November 2016  2
  • September 2016  2
  • July 2016  1
  • June 2016  1
  • March 2016  1
  • February 2016  2
  • December 2015  2
  • November 2015  1
  • October 2015  1
  • September 2015  1
  • August 2015  3
  • July 2015  3
  • April 2015  1
  • February 2015  1
  • January 2015  3
  • October 2014  2
  • September 2014  1
  • July 2014  2
  • June 2014  1
  • March 2014  2
  • February 2014  1
  • January 2014  1
  • October 2013  3
  • September 2013  1
  • July 2013  2
  • May 2013  3
  • March 2013  5
  • February 2013  1
  • January 2013  1
  • November 2012  2
  • October 2012  1
  • September 2012  3
  • August 2012  1
  • July 2012  1
© 2016 Tripod Advisors. D. A. Schlesinger Limited. Designed by iPulse Design Ltd.