Tripod Advisors Tripod Advisors
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • Schlesinger’s Thoughts
  • 关于
2016 Sep.14

Can China’s Best Newspaper Survive?

David SchlesingerBusiness, China, Media

I’m part of a ChinaFile debate on the state of the South China Morning Post. The whole conversation is here.

I make five urgent points I feel the newspaper needs to act on immediately:

1.    Write and publish a strong code of ethics and standards making clear that news decisions are taken without regard to politics or business interests.

2.    Hold the paper and editors accountable to that code by hiring an independent ombudsman or public editor or by appointing an independent board of trustees to oversee editorial independence.

3.    Learn to be open about decisions and missteps, building trust through transparency.

4.    Hire and train reporters who can build the paper’s reputation by good, solid reporting.

5.    Have editors who encourage reporting, guard against errors and having making the paper’s growth their only concern.

My full contribution is below:

CAN CHINA’S BEST NEWSPAPER SURVIVE?

By David Schlesinger

Pity the South China Morning Post!

Once called the world’s most profitable newspaper, its weekly jobs classified section was the size of a city’s telephone directory, the ever-flowing money from ads supporting a large and well-paid news staff.

Times changed, ads disappeared, owners changed and changed again.

Then, when it found its own billionaire owner-champion, it wasn’t a free-market liberal sitting in the US like the Washington Post’s Jeff Bezos of Amazon fame, but China’s own online shopping king, Jack Ma, whose mainland business and connections immediately raised the specter if not the reality of influence and interference from the Chinese Communist Party.

The question of whether the SCMP can survive and thrive actually contains packed within it several separate issues.

The first is whether an English-language newspaper based in Hong Kong, where English is rapidly being pushed to third-class status behind the native Cantonese and the Mandarin of mainland business, can ever realize its ambitions to be a regional or even global source of news on Greater China.

The second is whether a newspaper owned by a China-based company and mogul can ever escape the bounds and even stigma of its proprietorship to do good, quality journalism and to be appreciated for doing so.

So far, frankly, the paper has made a number of serious missteps. An early hagiographic article on Ma’s Alibaba certainly raised questions. More seriously still, the paper published under an anonymous “staff reporter” byline a tendentiously acquired phone interview with detained Chinese activist Zhao Wei in which she “regretted” her actions – at a time when neither her husband nor lawyer could reach her or confirm her whereabouts. Most recently, the SCMP abruptly stopped its Chinese web edition and killed its archive.

All of these missteps, in fact, could have been avoided.

Any mogul serious about running a respectable media operation must make clear that his business should be subject to the same scrutiny as any other – and that the potential conflict of interest must be explained. Any good editor should leap to that challenge.

The Zhao Wei story could have been made into a good one if the reporter had put his or her name to it, if the way the “interview” came about had been explained, if the restrictions on the interview were revealed to readers, if proper background had been put into the story.

The closing of the Chinese edition in fact probably was a sensible business decision – the SCMP has never been known for its Chinese-language coverage; it was blocked in the mainland anyway limiting its reach and commercial appeal; the Chinese-language market in Hong Kong and Taiwan is arguably overserved. But these things need to be explained; they need to be done in a measured way; and archives need to be preserved – otherwise you are simply asking for conspiracy theories.

For the Post to survive and thrive it needs to take action urgently:

1.    Write and publish a strong code of ethics and standards making clear that news decisions are taken without regard to politics or business interests.

2.    Hold the paper and editors accountable to that code by hiring an independent ombudsman or public editor or by appointing an independent board of trustees to oversee editorial independence.

3.    Learn to be open about decisions and missteps, building trust through transparency.

4.    Hire and train reporters who can build the paper’s reputation by good, solid reporting.

5.    Have editors who encourage reporting, guard against errors and having making the paper’s growth their only concern.

Finally, the new ownership structure unfortunately will always raise questions about the Post’s ability to thrive. Unlike Bezos who bought the Washington Post personally, without involving Amazon, Ma bought the SCMP through Alibaba, a listed company.

Should Alibaba’s own vast China business ever be threatened by Beijing’s unhappiness at the newspaper’s reporting, the company’s board would surely have a fiduciary duty to ensure that a frisky tail did not kill off an otherwise healthy dog. One concrete action to take would be to change this structure and insulate Alibaba and the newspaper from each other

When Jack Ma bought the SCMP, he said about editorial independence: “Trust us”. However, blind trust is not enough. For the paper to survive and thrive, readers need to say: “Show us”.

Show us through good reporting and writing.

Show us through good editing.

Show us through editorial standards.

Show us through honesty and transparency.

CHINACHINAFILEFOREIGN REPORTINGFREEDOM OF EXPRESSIONHONG KONGJOURNALISMMEDIAPRESS FREEDOM
Share this:
  • Previous

    Watch Out for the Generational Shift! My Views on Hong Kong’s Elections

  • Next

    China and Trump – So What About Human Rights

Latest in Schlesinger’s Thoughts

  • Hong Kong, Security Law, Sanctions, Compliance and IPOs
  • Webinar on Hong Kong
  • Soft Power – Stirring Symbols in Times of Virus
  • Webinar on Leading During The Crisis
  • New Ways Of Managing in the Age of the Virus

Categories

  • Asia
  • Business
  • China
  • Media
  • Portfolio
  • Speeches
  • Uncategorized

Tags

AGENCY BUSINESS BUSINESS CHINA CHINA CHINAFILE CHINAFILE coronavirus CPJ DAVID SCHLESINGER DAVID SCHLESINGER diplomacy Economy EXPERIENCE FOREIGN REPORTING FOREIGN REPORTING FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION HONG KONG HONG KONG HUMAN RIGHTS INFORMATION INFORMATION JOURNALISM JOURNALISM LEADERSHIP MEDIA MEDIA Military North Korea PRESS FREEDOM PRESS FREEDOM Protests REUTERS SOCIAL MEDIA SOFT POWER SPEECHES Taiwan Trade TRIPOD ADVISORS Trump U.S. United States Xi Jinping XINJIANG

Archives

  • July 2020  2
  • April 2020  1
  • March 2020  2
  • January 2020  1
  • December 2019  2
  • October 2019  2
  • September 2019  1
  • August 2019  2
  • July 2019  1
  • June 2019  2
  • March 2019  4
  • February 2019  1
  • January 2019  2
  • December 2018  1
  • November 2018  2
  • September 2018  1
  • August 2018  5
  • July 2018  2
  • June 2018  2
  • May 2018  3
  • April 2018  2
  • August 2017  3
  • June 2017  1
  • May 2017  1
  • March 2017  1
  • February 2017  1
  • November 2016  2
  • September 2016  2
  • July 2016  1
  • June 2016  1
  • March 2016  1
  • February 2016  2
  • December 2015  2
  • November 2015  1
  • October 2015  1
  • September 2015  1
  • August 2015  3
  • July 2015  3
  • April 2015  1
  • February 2015  1
  • January 2015  3
  • October 2014  2
  • September 2014  1
  • July 2014  2
  • June 2014  1
  • March 2014  2
  • February 2014  1
  • January 2014  1
  • October 2013  3
  • September 2013  1
  • July 2013  2
  • May 2013  3
  • March 2013  5
  • February 2013  1
  • January 2013  1
  • November 2012  2
  • October 2012  1
  • September 2012  3
  • August 2012  1
  • July 2012  1
© 2016 Tripod Advisors. D. A. Schlesinger Limited. Designed by iPulse Design Ltd.